| is there something wrong with the digging odds?: 2026-09-04 00:16:54 |
mr_fancy_pants
Level 56
Report
|
Humans are very good at finding patterns where there are none.
Your sample set is too small to make any meaningful conclusions, for a realistic comparison of the actual results to the expected, you would need more like 100k or a million samples, depending on your tolerance for error.
|
| is there something wrong with the digging odds?: 2026-09-10 02:04:27 |
Unicorn 36-4
Level 24
Report
|
The topper w/probability diggings is each dig stands alone. That is, you can dig 100 digs with the 3% chance of an Epic thinking you'll get at least one Epic, but never get any Epic.
|