The number of runner-up finishes is counted behind the slash. For the ranking, generally, the number of wins will be considered; only the ranking of players without any wins or an equal number of wins will be based on the number of runner-up finishes.
For example: A player with 6 runner-up finishes will be ranked ahead of a player with 5 runner-up finishes, but behind a player with 1 win.
This statistic is intended to be updated after every tournament in a new post. Inform me about any errors or lacking data. This ranking will be used to determine who qualifies for the yearly final tournament.
In case of a tie, the most recent winner will be preferred. There will never be two players with the same rank. For players without any win, the recency of the last runner-up finish decides.
I will henceforth only be making certificates for players that would like to have them sent by post. The effort is otherwise too large for a simple photo.
Certificates of past winners that wanted the digital copy are all still in my drawer - just let me know your address and I will send you all you have won.
The number of runner-up finishes is counted behind the slash. For the ranking, generally, the number of wins will be considered; only the ranking of players without any wins or an equal number of wins will be based on the number of runner-up finishes.
For example: A player with 6 runner-up finishes will be ranked ahead of a player with 5 runner-up finishes, but behind a player with 1 win.
This statistic is intended to be updated after every tournament in a new post. Inform me about any errors or lacking data. This ranking will be used to determine who qualifies for the yearly final tournament.
In case of a tie, the most recent winner will be preferred. There will never be two players with the same rank. For players without any win, the recency of the last runner-up finish decides.
The number of runner-up finishes is counted behind the slash. For the ranking, generally, the number of wins will be considered; only the ranking of players without any wins or an equal number of wins will be based on the number of runner-up finishes.
For example: A player with 6 runner-up finishes will be ranked ahead of a player with 5 runner-up finishes, but behind a player with 1 win.
This statistic is intended to be updated after every tournament in a new post. Inform me about any errors or lacking data. This ranking will be used to determine who qualifies for the yearly final tournament.
In case of a tie, the most recent winner will be preferred. There will never be two players with the same rank. For players without any win, the recency of the last runner-up finish decides.
Next week's Titled Tuesday will commence three hours earlier, at noon EDT. This is to rule out coinciding with the FIFA World Cup semifinal match France vs Spain, which commences at the regular Titled Tuesday starting time.
I just tried this week's template for TT, Elitist Africa. I think it's a perfect-sized template to be added to QM.
138 territories, perfect sized and the map is very sound. i just tried it as a one-player setup. i think this is a great format to highlight templates that have been buried and forgotten
those that play well should be voted on, each week if they should be added to QM as a template. this way, the collective wisdom of the players each week can be used to add new life into the QM format.
it would work great as a 1v1 or 2v2 setup. and be relatively quick to play.
The number of runner-up finishes is counted behind the slash. For the ranking, generally, the number of wins will be considered; only the ranking of players without any wins or an equal number of wins will be based on the number of runner-up finishes.
For example: A player with 6 runner-up finishes will be ranked ahead of a player with 5 runner-up finishes, but behind a player with 1 win.
This statistic is intended to be updated after every tournament in a new post. Inform me about any errors or lacking data. This ranking will be used to determine who qualifies for the yearly final tournament.
In case of a tie, the most recent winner will be preferred. There will never be two players with the same rank. For players without any win, the recency of the last runner-up finish decides.
