This is how The Impaller got her start. Alternatively, it could explain how HHH wins so much.

BUMP

file:///Users/walle13513/Desktop/Richard%20Sharpe%20Derp.jpg

The spain map, green raptor one is still best!

True. And it's called the philosoraptor.

i think arun misused the succesful black man meme.The entire point of the meme is too defeat a black stereotype and i don't think there is a stereotype that black players suck at warlight or getting bonuses fast.
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3qxc0n/

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3qxd65/
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3qxd8w/

lol at x's memes.

I hope Fizzer will answer this one.

Beaocuse 1.15 coems before 2

Skunk, so far the versions have been 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, [...] 1.9, 1.10, 1.11 [...] 1.15. So this is the 15th update to version 1.

Maybe 2.0 is reserved for the AI update? ;)

But seriously, you can have endless arguments about how to do version numbering:

• There are countless ways to do it "feature based": x.0 for major improvements, x.y for minor improvements, maybe even x.y.z for bug fixes; now have fun deciding what's a "major" improvement and what's "minor")
  
• Recently "date-based" is becoming more popular: Ubuntu version 12.4 is the one released in April 2012; Firefox does that as well (even though it's less visible, they increase their version number every six weeks, usually release x.0.1 after a few days to fix some issues, I can't remember their last x.1)
  
• Just don't bother; Chrome doesn't use a version number at all any more (or, at least, it doesn't display one)
  
• You can use version numbering and product names to confuse your customers (Microsoft, I'm looking at you: Windows Vista is version 6.0, Windows 7 is version 6.1 and Windows 8 is version 6.2)

So yes, you have a point: what would be so huge to deserve becoming "WL version 2"? (A similar thing happened to the Linux kernel; they had been at version 2 for so long, in the end they ended up going to 3.0 "just to get it over with".)
On the other hand, Fizzer does seem to be very consistent in his version numbering, which I consider a big plus. And besides, does it really matter all that much; this is a website, it's not like we can choose to downgrade to a previous version or anything... Let's be practical: when do you ever refer to a WL version number?

---

I just noticed there's a message "Before posting, please proofread to ensure your post uses proper grammar and is free of spelling mistakes or typos." below the text box where I type this message... Now that seems to warrant updating the forum version to 2.0! ;)